AFL Players Association president Patrick Dangerfield does not think the interchange needs to be capped, but would rather see the length of games shortened.

โ€œI havenโ€™t been a real advocate of reducing the interchange at all,โ€ he toldย SENโ€™s Whateley.

โ€œIt was certainly discussed and itโ€™s certainly been hotly debated among players, thereโ€™s plenty that arenโ€™t for it.

โ€œWe have a few players that are happy to reduce it, it wouldnโ€™t affect their game.โ€

The Brownlow Medallist said reducing the length of games was a view shared by his peers.

โ€œThere was no discussion yesterday on the length of the games, my personal view is itโ€™s something that we need to look at and I donโ€™t think they need to go for as long as they currently do,โ€ he said.

โ€œTo be honest, I think thatโ€™s a bit of a shared view from quite a few players that it wouldnโ€™t hurt to reduce games.

โ€œSomething like 100 minutes, I wouldnโ€™t see huge changes, just something thatโ€™s not as currently long as what it is now.โ€

The star midfielder explained how much of a toll the modern game takes on the players' bodies.

โ€œWe put a huge demand on our players, particularly with scheduling with five and six day breaks I think thereโ€™d be potential to have more of those throughout the season and balance up the scheduling for all clubs if we were able to reduce the length of games,โ€ Dangerfield said.

โ€œEffectively youโ€™d almost be playing a quarter less and weโ€™d be able to make sure that scheduling is a little bit better and more entertaining for supporters.โ€