The AFL has once again been urged to consider bringing in a secondary trade period for the mid-season.
Ahead of next week's Mid-Season Rookie Draft, further calls have been made for the league to introduce an exchange period that would look to benefit both clubs and players.
The Mid-Season Draft returned in 2019 and will take place on Wednesday, June 2 this year to see almost every club add to their 2021 list from a selection of over 600 players.
Speaking from a list point-of-view, former Tigers assistant coach and Brisbane great Justin Leppitsch said that clubs are given enough time throughout the year to land trades and open negotiations.
โI donโt think thereโs enough player movement in the game," Leppitsch said onย SEN's Crunch Time.ย
RELATED: Johnson urges Bulldogs utility to consider future
"Itโs so hard to get (any trades) done, itโs almost impossible, and youโve got to get it done in a week during trade period.
โCollingwood and Hawthorn are desperate to stockpile some draft points, why not do that next week (during a supposed mid-season trade period) instead of after the season?โ
Gerard Whateley also backed a mid-season trade period, stating it would be ideal for a particular group of players looking to offer their services.
โThere is an underclass of player who would be of great value of various clubs, they have higher value in season when clubs can identify their needs, and it's great for careers,โ Whateley said.
โIf youโre clever and creative, it would be so invigorating for the competition.โ
AFLPA chief executive Paul Marsh told SENย earlier this week that the ideology of bringing back a mid-season trade period remains to be considered.
"From our perspective, it [mid-season trade period] is not something that we are ruling out," Marsh said.
โThere are challenges associated with this from a player welfare perspective. There are logistical issues, even some financial issues for players. So, itโs something that we need to work through.
โSome of the coaches have expressed views historically that setting up your list for all eventualities is part of the art of list management and wouldnโt necessarily support this.
โBut I think we need to continue to evolve as an industry. Itโs certainly not something that we would rule out and we welcome discussion around it.โ