PERTH, AUSTRALIA - MAY 05: Justin Westhoff of the Power and Nic Naitanui of the Eagles contest the ruck during the round seven AFL match between the West Coast Eagles and the Port Adelaide Power at Optus Stadium on May 5, 2018 in Perth, Australia. (Photo by Paul Kane/Getty Images)

Nick Riewoldt has come out firing after Nic Naitanui’s suspension was upheld by the tribunal last night.

Naitanui was handed a one-match ban for a dangerous tackle on Port Adelaide’s Karl Amon and appealed the charge but after a lengthy hearing, the AFL Tribunal did not overturn the suspension.

Retired St Kilda champion Nick Riewoldt said it was a good tackle and Naitanui should not be penalised because he is of bigger size than Amon.

“This was a good football tackle. It was a free kick for in the back at worse,” Riewoldt said on AFL 360 last night.

“To expect Nic to make that split second decision as he was approaching Karl Amon (is unrealistic). What if it was Charlie Dixon? The ramifications would have been entirely different.

“I just think to expect the player to make that judgement in a split second is completely unrealistic.

“He didn’t sling. It wasn’t a spear tackle. Both arms weren’t pinned — one arm was free. Are we serious?

“I feel for the players. What are they meant to think when there is a split second to make a decision?”

SEE ALSO:  Key Docker signs two-year deal

Riewoldt also believes the match review system overall has got some problems at the moment.

“Either Michael Christian is having an absolute nightmare and he’s having an absolute shocker or the rules are wrong,” he added.

“I think based on what we’ve seen this year from the MRO and the results that have gone certain ways I’m just confused.”

The Eagles ruckman responded to the upheld appeal on twitter after the decision was handed down last night.

“Obviously disappointed but ain’t no point complaining about it,” Naitanui said.

“Starvation/homelessness are real issues. We smile and move on!”

The suspension has very much divided the footy world with some people strongly agreeing with the decision and others, such as Riewoldt, strongly disagreeing.